On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which > continue regardless of the licence chosen. > > In addition, the latest version of the CTs (1.2.3, at > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDEn2pYTY2DZfcpSLFdiBBU) > only requires of the mapper that you grant rights "to the extent that you > are able to do so". > > So you do not have to grant rights over OS data that you do not have. You > are only asked (Section 1a) to ensure that "You have the right to authorize > OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under our _current_ licence terms" > (my emphasis). The Open Government Licence is compatible with ODbL, so > contributions derived from OS OpenData are fine. Withdrawing incompatible > data after a putative future licence change is OSMF's problem, not yours.
Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm agreeing to if I click the magic button? Perhaps it's also been discussed by the nearmap crowd and I've just been deleting their emails. Richard _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb