On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 10:40 +0000, Bob Kerr wrote: > > I am presently doing some tracing in Dumfries and there is a way which > is marked public_transport=pay_scale_area. It is part of a Naptan > import. The area seems to be vague and is cutting across a number of > areas where I am doing some detailed work. > > Is there a good reason that this should still be kept? >
I've got a similar problem with ways showing the extent of hi-res Yahoo! imagery (tagged boundary=yahoo, area=yes). I can't see any real use for having this data in the database and if we were to do the same for other imagery sources then it'd soon become a right old mess. Any objections before I hit delete? Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb