Wow, what an incendiary email, I presume that was intentional and so as an outsider I feel compelled to respond with these 3 thoughts:
1) Unnecessary destruction of data seems particularly short sighted (maybe it is necessary, I'm not equipped to judge to be honest). 2) The points that are in the link in your email all seem perfectly reasonable, which makes me wonder what your objections to them are. 3) Are you carrying out some-kind of personal vendetta (or are you leading a group vendetta) against this TimSC person? I only ask because that is how it comes across to someone who is not at all engaged in the politics and history of involvement behind the open street map project. Adam On 12 Jun 2011, at 15:44, Andrew wrote: > There are many landuse polygons in the London area that were created by user > TimSC, who has not yet accepted the Contributor Terms. They will all be > purged > from the database when the licence changes if he continues not to do so. > TimSC > is now demanding changes to the way OSM is run with the treat of not > accepting > the CTs. (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.legal/6102) I > believe that, whatever the merits what he wants are, his methods are > unacceptable and the community should reject them. > > I therefore propose to delete every landuse polygon that TimSC created with > the hope that they will eventually be replaced with polygons based on high- > resolution imagery and ground surveys that we can use going forwards. > > -- > Andrew > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb