Some C roads are signed http://www.cbrd.co.uk/photo/c-roads/ (this topic sounds familiar!) which are arguably useful to sign, although I will admit unsigned ones are a bit useless!
Kev On 11 August 2011 11:56, Paul Williams <pjwde...@googlemail.com> wrote: > This morning, darren39 has fixed the unconnected way (125500644) Andy > mentioned (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8983662). > > A section of the A522 was also deleted in darren39's first changeset > after the block > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/62360148/history) and > replaced by a new way (version 1 of > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/125500635/history). This new > way also wasn't connected to various other roads including the next > section northbound of the A522, but I reconnected it. > > I think it would be much better if he didn't keep deleting ways when > he wants to alter them and instead altered the existing way, to avoid > creating all these unconnected roads (and also make it easier to see > the history of the way). > > While fixing some of his earlier work I've also noticed that he has > added C and D road references to several roads in Staffordshire (eg > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/62776742/history). I'm > wondering where he has found the information for these (C and D > references don't normally appear on road signs), and hope they haven't > been taken from a copyrighted source without permission. If the source > is OK, I'm not sure whether C and D roads should be tagged with a ref > tag, since it's not a reference for public use unlike M, A, and B > roads. > > Cheers > Paul Williams > (Paul The Archivist) > > On 10 August 2011 22:47, SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote: > > On 10/08/2011 22:06, Jonathan Bennett wrote: > >> > >> First changeset after expiry: > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8976461 > >> > > > > I'll bung him a message about way > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/62327024/history > > > > and way > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/125500644 > > which replaced it (and doesn't join properly) > > > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
