Hi Tim, Craig Many thanks, KeepRight does appear to fit the bill, it also seams to spot other things around Eastbourne and I will start work trying to clear them.
However, it has shown up that the edit I made yesterday isn't "perfect" as I didn't create "junction nodes". I can't see what's different about the nodes I created and the end points so I have no idea what I didn't do that I should have. Could you be kind enough to point me at the documentation for junction nodes so I can create them correctly. Ta Steve On 12/08/11 11:19, Craig Loftus wrote: > I think Keep right is what he is looking for, the "intersections without > junctions" error seems to fit the bill. Just untick the errors you're not > interested in. > > JOSM's validator is an option as well, but you obviously have to download > all the data for an area you want to check. > > Craig > > On 12 August 2011 10:09, Tim François <sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hmm, actually, may not be what you're looking for afterall - perhaps the >> in-built error checking features of JOSM may be better: if I remember >> correctly, trying to upload a changeset with ways crossing but not connected >> flags up a warning... >> >> Tim >> >> --- On *Fri, 12/8/11, Tim François <sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk>* wrote: >> >> >> From: Tim François <sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk> >> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking For Unconnected Cycleways >> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org, "Steve Dobson" <st...@dobbo.org> >> Date: Friday, 12 August, 2011, 10:06 >> >> >> If you haven't been told privately already: >> http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=7&lat=53.03726&lon=-3.41417&layers=B00T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C60%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C350%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1 >> >> Check out the list of 'errors' it displays on the left hand side... >> >> Hope it's helpful, >> Tim >> >> --- On *Fri, 12/8/11, Steve Dobson <st...@dobbo.org>* wrote: >> >> >> From: Steve Dobson <st...@dobbo.org> >> Subject: [Talk-GB] Looking For Unconnected Cycleways >> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org >> Date: Friday, 12 August, 2011, 10:00 >> >> Hi All >> >> Does anyone know of a way to look for highway segments that cross each >> other? It would also be useful if one could filter out certain types of >> highways, bridges for example. >> >> The problem is that I have found around Eastbourne that the cycle way >> close to my house was only connected to the "road" network at either >> end, although it crossed the roads several times. This caused the >> routing software in my Garmin Edge 705 (sat-nav) to route badly. I >> would there for like to fix all cycleways around Eastbourne that cross >> roads but do not share a common node at their point of intersection. >> The above search would be very helpful in this effort. >> >> Thanks for your suggestions. >> >> -- >> Steve Dobson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> > -- Steve Dobson _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
