> Ah, but we are not in the business of adding non-physical stuff just
> because
> it makes a search work better. If we have something to add postcode data
> to
> then that's right and proper, otherwise the postcode centroid database can
> be off map and referenced from a separate database.

I don't get what makes postcode centroids different from place=* nodes.
They are also non-physical insofar as you will not find a dot painted on
the ground with an adjacent sign saying "this dot is Townsville". If these
nodes are not for making a search work better, then I don't know why they
are there at all.  Naturally, having a place represented by a boundary
polygon would render the node redundant, but until then, the (usually
manually guestimated) centroid of the place is "good enough" and certainly
better than nothing. Or are you suggesting that the place=* nodes be put
in an external DB as well? Where do we draw the line?

Colin

>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin Smale [mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl]
>> Sent: 31 October 2012 12:26
>> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Office of National Statistics data
>>
>> > Colin, it's fine to add the postcode data to a node object (eg a poi),
>> > just don't create a node with just the postcode and nothing else as
>> > this is meaningless. The postcode data we have is not the information
>> > for individual buildings, its just the centroid of the address polygon
>> > which will contain any number of buildings (or post delivery points).
>> > Thus when using the data its still necessary to do some interpretation
>> > and it's not possible always to know that you are assigning the right
>> > postcode to the right building/delivery point because we don't know
>> > where the boundary of one postcode is against another for the same
>> > street etc.
>>
>> I am guessing that just having the centroid is plenty adequate for a lot
> of
>> reverse geocoding probably including routing, i.e. "where is XX1 3AB"
>> or "take me to XX1 3AB". Obviously it won't cover questions of the form
>> of
>> "what's the postcode for this building" which will require every
> individual
>> building/delivery point to be tagged.
>>
>> As (legal stuff permitting) "importing" the centroids would cover a very
>> popular use case with (IMHO) a quality which is adequate for most
>> people,
> I
>> would not be so quick to dismiss it.
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5864 - Release Date:
>> 10/30/12
>
>



_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to