Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: > Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 > To: Matt Williams > Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign > > > On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams <li...@milliams.com> wrote: > > > On 31 October 2012 14:37, David Fisher <djfishe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> The pedestrianised main shopping street in Croydon has a sign with > >> the following wording: "Pedestrian Zone. No vehicles except cycles > >> and for loading 6pm-10am." > >> How would you interpret that? I see at least 3 possibilities: > >> > >> (a) Cycles permitted at any time; loading only permitted 6pm-10am > >> (this is what I guess is the correct one) > >> (b) Cycles and loading only permitted 6pm-10am (this would also make > >> sense; i.e. cycling only outside shopping hours) > >> (c) Restrictions apply 6pm-10am (clearly ludicrous!) > >> (d) Something else? > >> > >> I'm guessing it's meant to be (a), but just thought I'd canvas > >> opinion before tagging. > > > > I think I agree with (a). I would find it a little strange to disallow > > cycling just during the day (why not just ban it entirely?). > > The centre pedestrianised bit of Ipswich has cycling banned from 10:30am - > 4:30pm. It does get pretty busy during that time. > http://goo.gl/maps/ouha1 >
I'm not sure that's correct? Is it not just banning cyclists from cycling against the traffic flow during this period? The sign at the other end suggests its open to cyclists at all times in the direction of normal flow. http://goo.gl/eYcsG Cheers Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
