Obviously the location of the site can be identified, and any excavations
recorded. These are current facts. But I keep watching Time Team and thinking
that all of the material they gather would make a good base for an historic
view of the UK. Not sure where we are with the servers for the historic map,
but in a lot of places the historic view breaks through into the current data!
So the idea that this material is stored in the same database is in so many
cases sensible? There is considerably less data that is totally lost to
redevelopment against that which is now being preserved below that development?
Being able to view what is actually recorded below that development would be an
excellent next step?
Sent from my android tablet, so quoting gets messed up!
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Savidge <a_sn...@hotmail.com>
To: "talk-gb@openstreetmap.org" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 7:14
Subject: [Talk-GB] Mapping Archaeology
Hi
A friend of mine belongs to a local Archaeology group and they are going to do
some surveying shortly using a variety of methods including ground penetrating
radar. I thought it would be nice if somehow the results get put onto Open
Street Map.
Are buried walls and landscape features suitable for recording on Open Street
Map perhaps at level -1? I have a feeling I saw something a while ago about a
parallel open streetmap that was intended for archaeology and recording things
that are no longer visible, but I have lost the link and can't find any
references to the site.
Any thoughts on the matter?
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
