I added a population tag to some of the dubious ones (primarily the larger non-cities) to enable them to be identified by the renderer.
Rochester/Chatham is complicated (not least by the fact that Rochester managed to lose its City status by accident). On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andy Street <a...@street.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:13:59 +0000 > Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If anything, I'd like to amend the UK use of place=city to come up > > with a use of the tag that fits in with global OSM usage. We can add a > > tag for 'ceremonial status' or similar to indicate they are a 'city' > > according to the weird UK rules but aren't actually cities in the main > > meaning of the word. So long as it's all agreed and documented, I'd be > > in favour of a change. > > +1 > > I see similarities between this and admin areas where I've tagged > admin_level=* to denote place within a global hierarchy then > supplemented it with designation=unitary_authority etc. to record > regional intricacies. > > Perhaps we could use designation=GB:city in this instance? > > -- > Regards, > > Andy Street > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
