Well there's a difference between armchair mapping and "making things look nice". As far as I can see this is a user who has no changeset comments and although contacted, hasn't replied. What should be done? I'm inclined to, then, put this into the vandalism section.
Opinions? Chris On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:21 AM, SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk>wrote: > On 18/03/2014 07:13, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote: > >> >> What seems to be the general purpose of his edits? His change sets have >> no comments, so could it be that this is just a case of an inexperienced >> mapper, at worst a vandal? >> >> > I'm not sure what the purpose is, as I've not had a reply to my messages. > I'm guessing that it's just "trying to make the map look nicer" where "the > map" is defined as the OSM standard map and "nicer" means "pretty, but not > necessarily reflecting reality". > > They're still making problematic edits - their most recent one > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21183766 > > appears to have broken a bus route here: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=20/ > 54.99086/-1.48286 > > Cheers, > > Andy > > -- Life is not the amount of times you breathe, is the moments that take your breath away. To all things comes an end. And to all things comes a beginning. Cred in inspirat, nu in expirat. in vise, nu in somn. In trait, nu in existat.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
