On 01/11/14 01:45, Matthijs Melissen wrote: >> On the whole the changes seem logical, but I'd rather they were applied >> > manually than setting a precedent to allow changes that may not ACTUALLY >> > apply as some small outlet is being a little economic with the name they >> > are using ...
> I would guess that's a rather hypothetical situation. Do you have any example? More a case that any attempt to do the job properly' and create proper relational data by using any table of 'valid' data and only allowing a reference to that table to be used has always been frowned upon. If we are going to 'dictate' what is acceptable content it should be managed properly rather than blindly re-writing tags. I'm not saying that the changes are wrong ... just that this is not the right method to get things done. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
