On 29 December 2014 at 17:06, SK53 <sk53....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for Rob for adding the missing footpaths > <http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/hanbury-footpaths_24885#14/52.8432/-1.7341> > (although I've read his blog posts about using umap, seeing is believing). > > Obviously we can potentially knock more of these on the head if we > split-up, but then we can't map & chat. One benefit of mappers from > different places is the chance to share perspectives on how, what etc. one > maps. > > So I'd like to suggest everyone meets at the rendezvous, and that at least > the first short walk is done as a group. > > Sounds good. It will be interesting to see this crater near the pub. Depending on the number of people we can probably split into 2 or 3 groups afterwards (and then catch up again in the pub).
Also if anyone wants to do some mapping from home before we head out there's quite a bit to be done aligning roads, mapping landuse and/or tracing buildings. Rob > Regards, > > Jerry > > PS. There is also a good opportunity to clarify if mapped paths which dont > have the designation tag are rights of way. I'll try and produce a file of > nodes where PRoWs end up on roads, for checking. > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
