On 28 January 2015 at 01:13, Neil Matthews <ndmatth...@plus.net> wrote:
> Do we need an OSM disclaimer -- I've just had a mail from a gentleman > enquiring why an underground powerline http://www.openstreetmap.org/ > way/127968407/history#map=17/51.50283/-2.55462 was drawn on OSM -- as he > didn't want to buy a house on top of it and Western Power told him the > powerline couldn't be there! I think he joined OSM just to message me?!? > > I suspect he might have been more upset if he was selling... > > Cheers, > Neil (ndm) > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > What if a driver has an accident and says "I got the map from OSM and it states this is a primary route - so I expected it to have been suitable for my journey.' ? Why doesn't OSM seem to care about the quality of the mapping - marking roads arbitrarily to someone else's classifications rather than as per what appears on the ground ? -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
