On 18 August 2015 at 10:20, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18/08/2015 07:43, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2015 03:56, "Andy Townsend" <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There's no interest to do this in the OSM "standard" style because it is >> abundantly clear that any new attempts at changes that make rural navigation >> possible* in OSM-carto would be rejected based on the ones that already have >> been over the last year. > > This is not true, a different rendering based on hiking routes or public > rights of way is something we could certainly consider. > > > As I said previously, changes such as this aren't really relevant "if you > can't see the paths themselves at all at a zoom level you'd use for planning > a route over them.". > > However, now you're saying "... a different rendering ...".
I meant that we could consider changing the current Default rendering. > In the > immediately previous message you said: > > "So far there is little interest to do this on the OSM default render style > which seems odd to me given how much fuss there has been on this list to > recent changes to the footway/path style (over the last year)!" I didn't write that (or anything you address in the rest of your message) - I am not Rob Nickerson. -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
