Adding accurate data is, of course, improving OSM, but only if it's from
an allowable source.
The lack of communication implies there's something to hide.
Dave F.
On 22/10/2015 21:34, Colin Smale wrote:
If their edits are factually correct, they are improving OSM which is
a good thing. But they should really engage more with the community so
we can see where all this wisdom is coming from, what they are working
towards and who is behind it. Failure to respond to the many enquiries
does not exactly do anything to help their case.
--colin
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
