It might not have gone actually, my e-mailing doesn't always do the right thing for the lists.
I quoted it in my last e-mail though. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-February/018474.html On 15 February 2016 at 13:48, Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't find Gregory's suggestion in my mailbox... did it go to the list? > > Is the suggestion to put place:designation=city on the place node? Or on > an admin boundary, or on a landuse=residential or what? Why is > place:designation needed, and not simply designation? And would this mean > that St Davids is place=town, place:designation=city or the other way round? > > > //colin > > On 2016-02-15 14:21, Andy Townsend wrote: > > On 15/02/2016 12:35, Gregory wrote: > > What did people think of my place:designation=* suggestion? > > > Sounds good to me. No uses yet (obviously), but would allow a more sane > "place" tagging for e.g. St David's, which isn't a really city in any > normal sense. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > -- Gregory [email protected] http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
