Thanks Neil, I think I'll just have to go with that solution and then delete the ways I don't want.
Tom web: http://tomchance.org twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP On 23 April 2016 at 16:42, Neil Pilgrim <osm-talk...@kepier.clara.net> wrote: > I've had a play with this since I've been working with overpass turbo a > bit recently; the best I've come up with so far is something like this: > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPR (waaaay over-commented ;)) > As you'll see, this does include these roads, but does also include roads > leaving the area. > If you un-comment the relation, then that shows the boundary too, which I > found useful for debugging. > This may be able to be simplified/optimised, but I've gone with what > works, and I switched to using a timeout/json as I'm used to that :) > If the ways missing were part of the relation then I think > way(r.A)[highway][name] should select them too, but that's not how the > relation is composed. > > Hope that gives some other ideas, if nothing else :) > > -- > Neil > > > On 23 April 2016 at 14:20, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It has been a very long time since I last posted here! >> >> I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the >> bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone spot >> the problem in the data? >> >> Here's the example I'm working with: >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPI >> >> The problem is that some roads aren't being downloaded with the query. >> >> If you follow that link and run the query, you'll see that the top >> section of Belvedere Road, and all of Landsdowne Place, are excluded. There >> are a few others like this on the edges of the area. >> >> I thought it might be because the way used by the boundary relation runs >> down the same nodes as those roads. But just at the top of those roads, the >> A-Road Church Road is downloaded despite being represented in the data in >> the same way. >> >> I tried putting a 'kink' in the boundary way down at the other end of >> Landsdowne Place where it meets Fox Hill so it 'encompasses' a node, but >> that didn't help. >> >> I hope this all makes sense, and maybe somebody can help? >> >> Tom >> >> web: http://tomchance.org >> twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
