On 22/05/16 14:55, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Just noticed two local 'paid-for' attractions, namely Hillier Gardens
and Mottisfont, both just outside Romsey, have had their paths tagged
for foot=permissive which seems somewhat misleading given that an
admission charge is required.
My thoughts are to remove the foot=permissive tags from the paths in
both these attractions but won't do so if this is going against current
tagging practice.
I would think that the path should be tagged foot=customers not
untagged, although a general access tag might be OK. Also, if the whole
park is mapped as an area with restricted access, that is probably
implied onto the paths.
On the other hand, access=yes is OK for toll roads.
I definitely think that access=permissive is wrong (although most paths
in public parks should be so tagged, which is probably the source of the
problem).
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
