Brian was referring to "street" relations, not "associatedStreet" which is something very different.
In any case, I believe the support for street relations approaches roughly zero, and that really the repeated street names is something the renderer needs to fix (and it can be done). Simon Am 21.11.2016 um 21:02 schrieb Marc Gemis: > An associatedStreet has no impact at all on the renderer. > Nominated uses it to a certain degree to match houses with streets (in > case the addr:street does not match the name of a street in the > proximity). > There are some tools from the French community that uses this relation > as well. The French typically place some reference information into > the relation. > > I think the street relation is used / supported even less. > > regards > > m > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> Road ways are becoming increasingly chopped up into smaller pieces as more >> data is added ( speedlimits, bus routes, cycle routes, lane counts, lane >> types and lane turns; restrictions etc.) and the name becomes similarly >> repeated. >> >> I'm hesitant to use the relation street and shift the name to the relation >> as the wiki says this relation is not supported and I'm also not sure how it >> will render, but it does seem as it would cure the problem. (Does anyone >> else actually see it as a problem?) >> >> Has anyone used this relation successfully? >> >> Regards >> >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
