Hi everyone
I'd have thought that from a TfWM point of view, Mapillary pics going through
to HERE would be a positive advantage.
If they want their junction changes to be immediately available and working for
a wide range of routing providers and self driving vehicles that is.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> Date:
21/09/2017 22:33 (GMT+00:00) To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re:
[Talk-GB] OpenStreetCam or Mapillary?
Not commenting directly on the pros and cons, but through their
cooperation with Here using mapillary for this would make the
material directly available to a competitor too. Now you can
consider this a good thing or bad, but in any case it needs to be
considered.
Slightly OT;
while I don't have any first hand knowledge specifically about
the UK, but continental Europe has a largish number of companies
that do that kind of photographic asset management professionally
(and which seem to have an at least half working business model
because they still exist). The results of the surveys they do tend
to not be open to the general public for privacy reasons and so
on, but getting our hands on that kind of material would be great.
Naturally these kind of things tend to be "slightly" more
expensive than using a smart phone camera.
Simon
Am 21.09.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Brian
Prangle:
Hi everyone
I'm in discussions with Transport for West Midlands to use
their inspection teams' time on the street to assist us
by taking photos with smartphones, which will also help
them with their asset management and not have to rely on
outdated data from Google StreetView.
Which one of the above is better for us? Or just plain
better?
Regards
Brian
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
