Mike wrote: > A typical code is "PB|SP29|4/1"
Be warned, this is not the format that Pembrokeshire use on the pdf scans on their website. It seems to be GIS data only and may be a format Barry made. PB is "Pembrokeshire"! As Pembrokeshire don't use parish names I'd go for prow_ref="FP SP29/4/1" assuming this is a footpath. Thanks, Rob On 6 Nov 2017 12:30 p.m., "Rob Nickerson" <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave, > > I think the point was that nobody has a common format. Some LAs use a > different style when they refer to the same path in the definitive > statement when compared to the GIS data. > > Of course we can manipulate OGL data. That's included in the licence. If > we do change then it should be obvious to the LA what we mean if we speak > with them. > > I will be sticking with the wiki for any I map as this has been previously > discussed and has therefore grown traction according to taginfo. > > For Leicestershire it seems to be an obvious change: they don't include > Parish so just don't include it. So I'd map prow_ref="FP J16" as an example. > > P.s. I thought folks usually don't like to add third party database > references to OSM. Hence we came to an agreement of how prow_ref should be > *constructed* based on OGL data (not just a copy of one of the third party > attribute values). > > Thanks, > Rob >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
