Hi again Rob, If you want some more work to do... given there will always be false positives, per Point 3 of your original email, would you be able to add a facility so we could mark these as such inline, eg as https://www.keepright.at does?
S36 7GG, for example, correctly spans three addressable roads. Regards, *Paul* On 30 January 2018 at 15:04, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 January 2018 at 11:40, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > > On 30/01/18 10:14, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > >> > >> (There weren't nearly as many objects in case 2 as I thought there > >> would be here based on people's comments, so it's possible I've messed > >> up the programming logic somewhere. If there are still any objects > >> with a highway=* tag listed in other sections, then please let me > >> know, and I'll see if I can fix the bug.) > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4298681 is now listed in 'highways with > > postcodes' for WR12 7EP, but my next road which is tagged the same way > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4299405 is under 'Street Name > Mismatches > > in Postcode Unit' but has the same name in both columns, so I don't see > what > > the problem is ... > > Sorry about that -- it was a bug in my code -- which I think I've > fixed now. Have another look at > http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/addresses/street-warnings/WR.html -- > there's a lot more moved to the highways section now. > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
