Dont forget the amenity=bicycle_parking usage (mentioned in the wiki) where the semantics are different from those you describe.12200+ examples in England.
Probably the more usual way of mapping a platform canopy is with building=roof or building=canopy with possibly wall=no. Jerry On 29 May 2018 at 15:48, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29/05/18 14:53, Tony Shield wrote: > >> > >> At the end of this week (2nd June) I intend to change the platforms I > know > >> to remove covered=yes, if you disagree please challenge. > > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the issue seems to be that the > carto change works on the assumption that covered=yes implies the > feature isn't visible (e.g. because partly underground), whereas > others may be are working on the assumption that covered=yes means you > won't get rained on (e.g. there is some kind of roof)? > > The wiki seems pretty clear actually - it only really talks about the > first of the two meanings. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered > I'm not aware of any "UK-local" consensus to be different about that. > > I personally haven't use the "covered" tag (no reason), but I do add > building=roof objects to some train stations. > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
