On 28 January 2019 06:17:04 GMT+08:00, David Woolley <for...@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: >On 27/01/2019 21:21, Colin Smale wrote: >> Organisation Organisation Name 60 n/a >> Department Name 60 n/a >> Premises Sub Building Name 30 > >addr:unit
What about the Sub Building Name? >> Building Name 50 addr:housename >> Building Number 4 addr:housenumber >> Thoroughfare Dependent Thoroughfare Name 60 > >This is the one that actually normally causes questions. It is quite >common to have named terraces, and to have runs of maisonettes numbered >within a name. Good point.I would also add campuses in this category. Although I am not 100% sure if that's how they are classified in PAF. >> Dependent Thoroughfare Descriptor 20 >> Thoroughfare Name Street 60 addr:street >> Thoroughfare Descriptor 20 >> Locality Double Dependent Locality Small villages 35 >> Dependent Locality 35 >> Post town 30 addr:city > >Firstly, addr in OSM is generally postal, not geographical. As >indicated elsewhere containment (or is_in) define the geographical >place. True, but full address would still include extra information. We can infer addr:country and addr:county from admin areas but everything else should be _possible_ to tag. >Secondly, in practice the only parts of the address you need are the >detailed destination point code and the post code. However, I >discovered that the postie on the beat also needs the street name to >avoid having to look it up from the postcode. It should still be possible to encode a typical full address with tags. Sometimes people will want extract the full address from OSM, sometimes they will want to search for a part of it. Even if someone is searching for a house number and a postcode alone it is useful to see if e.g. a street name of the result matches expectations. Best wishes, Andrzej _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb