Personally I don't think that is very user friendly. I can post onto my Google drive or upload to the wiki (if it's one of the very few file types it supports) but others may not know or be bothered.
It's quite normal to include attachments in line with communication (e.g an attachment in an email or an attachment in a chat/instant message program). We should allow people the choice so that they are able to do what comes naturally to them. *Rob* On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 13:37, Ed Loach <edlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rob wrote: > > > Joking aside, please note I'm not asking for much here. A 40kb limit is > tiny and > > people do breach the limit occasionally. In this instance it was ~500kb. > I ended up > > having to put the attachments elsewhere but that delayed the post by 24 > hours > > (it was already late and I decided to delay faffing until the next day). > > I suspect a small limit is designed to discourage attachments, which could > be hosted elsewhere and links included. > > Ed > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
