Seems as if the culprit is reverting the changesets themselves (not quite done as I write this). I do think a mandatory debrief on how they managed to do this without noticing is clearly in order.
Nobody moves > 100'000 nodes and then uploads them without tons of indications that something is wrong. Simon Am 04.08.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Roland Olbricht: > Dear all, > > there has been a couple of probably accidential movements of thousands > of nodes off central London. > > The changesets in question are most likely > > 72980739 > 72980741 > 72980743 > 72980748 > 72980751 > 72980758 > 72980760 > 72980761 > 72980762 > 72980765 > 72980767 > > I'm attempting to revert them right now. As JOSM is surpringly slow on > the task, I'm happy about any help. > > Best regards, > > Roland > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
