I believe the last errant changeset was just reverted.
Am 04.08.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Simon Poole: > Seems as if the culprit is reverting the changesets themselves (not > quite done as I write this). I do think a mandatory debrief on how they > managed to do this without noticing is clearly in order. > > Nobody moves > 100'000 nodes and then uploads them without tons of > indications that something is wrong. > > Simon > > Am 04.08.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Roland Olbricht: >> Dear all, >> >> there has been a couple of probably accidential movements of thousands >> of nodes off central London. >> >> The changesets in question are most likely >> >> 72980739 >> 72980741 >> 72980743 >> 72980748 >> 72980751 >> 72980758 >> 72980760 >> 72980761 >> 72980762 >> 72980765 >> 72980767 >> >> I'm attempting to revert them right now. As JOSM is surpringly slow on >> the task, I'm happy about any help. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Roland >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
