On 19/12/2019 02:09, Warin wrote:
On 19/12/19 13:01, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 19/12/2019 01:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
Aside from this particular question, that's actually a problem that
happens all the time with things like "amenity=pub; tourism=hotel" -
I'd rather the mapper make a clear choice as they know what is there,
the render makes a 'best guess'.
Not really. pub & hotel are synonymous but building=yes (which
indicates it's operational) is antonymous to disused:building
Some pubs are not hotels - no accommodation.
I was referring to Andy's example where both tags are on the same object
I have taken to mapping the building as a close way with building=*
and then adding separate nodes for pub and another for the hotel if it
has that.
Note I am not consistent in this (but I should be)!
I have done similar, but never felt it an ideal situation. it ends up
with three detached objects representing one establishment. Where would
you add the FHRS:ID tag?
I try & do 'the duck test'. I ask 'what is it most known for' If it's a
pub, which happens to have a few rooms, then amenity=pub,
accommodation=yes, & alternatively tourism=hotel, bar=yes
Cheers
DaveF
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
