Thank you all for your contributions to this discussion. There does appear to still be a bit of a trick here as the disused tag for areas/buildings is still expected to be used with regards to an amenity tag, and building=apartments is a description of the construction/building but also indicates its use.
The towers in question are due to be demolished in 2020. I’ve made them building=yes and kept the building level tags, and name, as they’re still visible. The landuse has been changed from residential to brownfield. Additionally, i’ve added a note and a source indicating their expected demolishion date. Fwiw, building=disused with disused=apartment *does* render differently (dashed lines, like construction) in the ID editor at least... but that’s just one render, so i’ve held back. Gareth From: Warin<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: 18 December 2019 23:47 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments On 19/12/19 00:41, Mike Baggaley wrote: > Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments > would fulfill all the needs. Err no. Having both tags on the one object is contradictory. How is it determined which tag to render? A building=* is rendered one way. A disused:building=* is rendered another. So .. is it a "building" or a "disused building"??? _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
