Hi Dave, I agree with what you suggest. Can we be a bit precise though about what you propose? You're proposing to remove amenity=university from building=university in Cambridge, and make no other tagging changes?
(Ironically, the current tagging makes it hard for me to search to see if there's a "proper" amenity=university in there somewhere, e.g. as a relation or area covering a large swathe of them.) Best Dan Op di 4 feb. 2020 om 14:15 schreef Dave F via Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>: > > Hi > There was a discussion 5 years ago. There may have been others. > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017455.html > > Many amenity=university tags were added unnecessarily to building=yes > A contributor had converted these to building=university, in accordance > with the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Duniversity > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40649767 > This allows the removal of the amenity tags without loss of data. > > The user who created his disparate tagging schema has had plenty of time > to rectify. I think this should be performed now. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
