On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 15:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB < talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > > > Feb 4, 2020, 16:37 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > > >> (Ironically, the current tagging makes it hard for me to search to see > >> if there's a "proper" amenity=university in there somewhere, e.g. as a > >> relation or area covering a large swathe of them.) > > > >There isn't, I'm afraid.. it's a right hotchpotch > IMHO, it would be a waste of time, if you tried to create a single area > object (do I mean "closed way"?) to be the university. > > Or multipolygon, like for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3830877 > > The University is a collection of colleges, so could be a relation... > ...except that each college is probably in several buildings and they may > not be in a contiguous area, so each college might have to be a relation of > buildings. So you would have a hierarchy of relations. > > Or areas that belong to multipolygon of college and multipolygon of > university (?) > > We used to enjoy the look of puzzlement on the faces of (mostly American) > tourists, who stood in the middle of town, surrounded by colleges, mixed in > with shops, offices and other buildings, and asked which way to go to the > University. > > :) In this case university multipolygon (or closed way) covering most of > city center > sounds correct and would help OSM-using tourists. > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> > Isn't this what site relations are for? That way POI nodes etc also belonging to the University can be included. On a completely unrelated note. Does any software actually support site relations?
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
