I can’t quickly find any of the Holiday Inn places you mention, but the buildings with the eatbu address seem wrong.
The brief cs comment often says “building added, merged with node” and to me the merge seems a likely source of the error. I’d say the building should be tagged for itself, with a node for the holiday apartment separately - with link to the website if that’s appropriate. I do wonder what London will look like if every AirBnB gets added to the map like this. Maybe that’s all good, and renderers can deprioritise the resulting rash. But also wonder if the on the ground rule requires that what looks indistinguishable from any old private door, shouldn’t get a special tag. On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 09:01, Steven Hirschorn <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't emailed the mapper yet, but was wondering about these edits: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Amelia%20Harper/history#map=12/51.5288/-0.1589 > > - Many are tagged with the "Holiday Inn" brand and wikidata though I can't > see evidence they are operated by Holiday Inn. > - They all include links to a different website, eatbu.uk, which would > seem unusual if any of them are run by Holiday Inn. > - Sometimes additional tags for a rental apartment have been added to an > existing building (eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24951392, > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100608763) > > Am I being paranoid? Locations of guest houses with links are useful in > OSM. > > Steven > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
