Their latest edit is adding an apartment where they tagged the entire building looks wrong.
I have commented on this, at the moment with my DWG hidden down the side of the settee, asking for sources and in that case verifiability. I have raised a ticket so if anyone wishes to add a comment please email to [email protected] with the subject [Ticket#2025082310000136] Phil (trigpoint) On 23 August 2025 12:48:56 BST, David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: >On 23/08/2025 09:25, Edward Bainton wrote: >> I do wonder what London will look like if every AirBnB gets added to the >> map like this. Maybe that’s all good, and renderers can deprioritise the >> resulting rash. But also wonder if the on the ground rule requires that >> what looks indistinguishable from any old private door, shouldn’t get a >> special tag. > >One might find a lot of listings being short lived, as councils became aware. >You are not allowed more than 90 occupied days a year in London, without >planning permission, and I think most do not have permission. The locations on >AirBnB's own map are often not accurate enough to identify the property. > >I think they should be treated as service area businesses, even though they do >have some physical presence (the business itself is not contactable by a >chance visit). Typically the host does not live there, and there is a key box >for the guests. The guests get told how to get there once the contract has >been made. >_______________________________________________ >Talk-GB mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
