On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:09 PM, da fo43 <daf...@outlook.com> wrote: > Thanks for the replies so far, anyone else want to gibe an opinion? To > address some of the points: > <snip> > > > Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 00:36:42 +0000 > > From: Ken Guest <kgu...@php.net> > ... > > Changing the tagging of roads based on an arbitrary reason such as an > > assigned L ref value where we presume there is a consistent scheme > applied > > to it is mindless. Not all [county] councils assigned values based on the > > quality of the road, I know of at least one where the assigned value is > > based on the electoral division that the road is in. > > Would you agree that L1000-4999 are called local primary and L5000-9999 > are called local secondary by all county councils? >
No, for reasons already stated. -- http://about.me/kenguest/ _______________________________________________ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
