Mark, That's exactly how it should be done and I'll be using the one you did as the example for the video.
Conor, The video showing how this is done will be up some time tomorrow (slow connection so can't be more specific) Dave On 28 Oct 2014 02:14, "Mark Tully" <markjtu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had a similar issue with Ballyboughlin in Offaly. See > > http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/oocmaps.html?zoom=15&lat=53.35462&lon=-7.63757&layers=B0000TFFFFFFFF > and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4122877. > > I elected to put both parts into the same relation, ensuring that each part > formed a complete loop in JOSM and marking them all as outers. The second > section of Ballyboughlin (the "Part of..." section) was entirely surrounded > by Raheen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4122899), so I marked > that > section as an inner in Raheen's relation. > > I did it like this as it seemed like the most sensible method to me, but > maybe there's a better way to do it. > > Mark > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Conor Jones <co...@malinbeg.com> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > First off, great to be back on the mailing list and to see a very active, > > committed community alive and kicking > > > > I've started mapping townlands in SW Donegal - and while I went at it > with > > all guns blazing... it's damn hard work! > > > > > > I've encountered a few strange occurrence last-night on my maps where the > > one townland is spilt across 2 dis-joined areas > > > > Examples: > > > > Cappagh townland (OSM): > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139615#map=16/54.6334/-8.6459 > > > > Cappagh townland (OSI 25"): > > http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,558685,876576,7,9 > > > > I shouldn't use the OSI link but I can't find a method for linking to an > > area on the TCD sheets > > > > > > You'll see that that small townlands of Cappagh and the bordering > townland > > of Croaghlin are marked as "part of ..." the larger townlands of the same > > name just off to the West > > > > For now, I have simply created a seperate relation / townland for each > > section and named them the same, which OSM seems to be handling OK... but > > Nominatim will only see one instance it appears. However, I believe that > to > > do this correctly, I should use a master relation or somehow merge the > > boundaries of each townland section into one relation > > > > Has anyone encountered similar to this? It seems to be common in the area > > I'm mapping in SW Donegal > > > > Any advice? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > C > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-ie mailing list > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ie mailing list > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > _______________________________________________ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
