Thanks Sajjad.
So I guess, I will continue using the PDF files for constituencies to trace
assemblies then?

(OT: The census of 2000 and the delimitation was done in 2008? When will
they incorporate the 2011 census then?)


On 20 December 2013 16:00, Sajjad Anwar <m...@sajjad.in> wrote:

> Dear Vikas,
>
> These boundaries are no longer valid because they have changed in 2008.
> Unfortunately, they haven't released the post-delimitation data.
>
> Follow along the discussion on the Datameet list -
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/datameet/AZrQAoeeDhU
>
> Cheers,
> Sajjad.
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:17 PM, ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav)
> <mevi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> http://web.archive.org/web/20101012225159/http://eci.gov.in/eci_main/GisLayers/gis_layers.asp
> >
> > http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/GisLayers/GIS_AC_Data.zip
> > http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/GisLayers/GIS_PC_Data.zip
> >
> > They upgraded their site recently.
> >
> >
> > On 20 December 2013 13:16, ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) <mevi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Shajeer.
> >> I like this idea. No experience is working with shape files though. Do
> you
> >> know which govt dept. makes shape files? Is it ECI or other?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19 December 2013 15:56, Shajeer M <shaj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Based on the old email
> >>>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2009-March/000378.html
> >>> discussions we had, election commission did put some shape files for PC
> >>> (Parliament) and AC (Assembly). This is no longer available on their
> site.
> >>>
> >>> Quick search shows a similar named file here -
> >>>
> https://bitbucket.org/thejeshgn/open-data-india/src/d2e84516e06525962fc61991bfdaa28ecf133fa2/GIS/India_PC/?at=default
> >>>
> >>> From: Arun Ganesh
> >>> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:04 PM
> >>> To: Vikas Yadav
> >>> Cc: OpenStreetMap in India
> >>> Subject: Re: [Talk-in] parliamentry, assembly seat boundaries
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I did some research into the different jurisdictions, and I think I
> have
> >>> a fair Idea now of how our Government is structured :)
> >>>
> >>> I'll start a page on the osm wiki so we can build on this:
> >>>
> >>> Electoral
> >>>
> >>> State [State Secretariat - Chief Minister]
> >>>
> >>> Lok Sabha Constiuency [Lok Sabha - MP]
> >>>
> >>> Vidhan Sabha Constituency [State Secretariat - MLA]
> >>>
> >>> District Panchayat (Zilla Panchayat)
> >>>
> >>> Block Panchayat (Panchayat Samiti) [Block Development Officer]
> >>>
> >>> Gram Panchayat [Sarpanch]
> >>>
> >>> Revenue
> >>>
> >>> District [Headquarter - Collector]
> >>>
> >>> Subdistrict [Headquarter - Tahsildar]
> >>>
> >>> Revenue Block [Revenue Inspector]
> >>>
> >>> Village Block
> >>>
> >>> Civic
> >>>
> >>> Municipal Corporation / Municpality / Town or Village Panchayat [Town
> >>> Hall - Mayor]
> >>>
> >>> Zone [Zone office]
> >>>
> >>> Ward [Ward office - Ward Councillor]
> >>>
> >>> Economic
> >>>
> >>> Metropolitan Region
> >>>
> >>> SEZ
> >>>
> >>> Police
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Vikas Yadav <vi...@thevikas.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Arun.
> >>>>
> >>>> They are changed once after a census since all are usually use
> >>>> population to adjust it properly though other parameters are also
> used. In
> >>>> conjunction to government offices and their bodies, these boundaries
> are
> >>>> very critical. Then there is a lot of meta data about the current MP,
> MLA or
> >>>> Councillor  depending on the area. We can choose how much of it we
> put in
> >>>> OSM. Also, all these three boundaries can overlap each other. There
> is no
> >>>> hierarchy to these, e.g. assembly can belong to two parliamentary
> >>>> constituencies or two municipal wards belong to two assemblies. All
> the
> >>>> infrastructure we have in OSM india, like streets, schools, signals,
> >>>> toilets, they all belong to a particular ward, assembly or
> parliamentary
> >>>> boundary depending on the type of POI. When this gets defined
> properly, OSM
> >>>> data can later be used very nicely by citizens to locate responsible
> offices
> >>>> for complaining and monitoring, maintaining the public properties.
> >>>>
> >>>> See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delimitation_Commission_of_India
> >>>> See: http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/delimitation_faq.aspx
> >>>>
> >>>> (disclaimer: im interested in making OSM a good tool for RTIs)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 16 December 2013 15:50, Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:24 AM, ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav)
> >>>>> <mevi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> (also posted this in osm india forum)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have checked the info for India in
> >>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrativeand 
> >>>>>> could
> >>>>>> not find the boundary (admin_level) for parliamentary, assembly
> limits. I
> >>>>>> have only started image tracing over the NCR maps given by election
> >>>>>> commission and state election commissions. I could not find a
> better data
> >>>>>> source.
> >>>>>> Im using a number admin_level=6 for assembly boundaries and will use
> >>>>>> admin=5 for parliamentary boundaries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since electoral boundaries don't necessarily overlap with
> >>>>> administrative boundaries, this scheme could get quite messy. I
> would think
> >>>>> we should reserve the admin_level tags purely for administrative
> divisions
> >>>>> like those mentioned here:
> >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_division
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i.e States, Districts, Subdistricts, Municipal Corporations,
> >>>>> Municipalities, Panchayats
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There seems to be some work on boundary=political which is probably
> >>>>> more relevant for constituencies:
> >>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpolitical
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But even I'm not completely sure how these boundaries compare in
> India,
> >>>>> we have so many types of overlapping jurisdictions and need a better
> >>>>> understanding of what they are to come up with a tagging scheme. Is
> there
> >>>>> any comprehensive resources to understand all these boundaries, I'll
> >>>>> document them on the wiki if there are any leads.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please suggest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Vikas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Talk-in mailing list
> >>>>>> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Arun Ganesh
> >>>>> (planemad)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Arun Ganesh
> >>> (planemad)
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Talk-in mailing list
> >>> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Talk-in mailing list
> >>> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-in mailing list
> > Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sajjad Anwar | W: http://sajjad.in | T: @geohacker
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Reply via email to