2009/9/24 Guido Piazzi <gu...@fotocaos.it>: > On gio, 2009-09-24 at 20:18 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> > 3. landuse=wood lo boicottiamo e quindi non lo usiamo >> >> va bene anche per me, ma perché non boicottiamo anche natural=wood e >> mettiamo natural=forest invece? avere 2 valori diverse no lo trovo >> molto intuitivo... > > Forse perché natural=wood esiste e natural=forest invece no. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural
buona osservazione, viene pure usato (OSM Doc) 86804 volte. contro landuse=forest 261855 volte landuse=wood 683 volte hm, non mi piace cmq. rimane anche il dubbio sul significato: (wp:en): "Ecologically, a woodland is an area covered in trees, usually at low density, forming an open habitat, allowing sunlight to penetrate between the trees, and limiting shade. Woodland may support an understory of shrubs and herbaceous plants including grasses. Woodland may form a transition to shrubland under drier conditions or during early stages of primary or secondary succession. Higher densities and areas of trees, with largely closed canopy provide extensive and nearly continuous shade are referred to as forest." e poi: "Woodland is used in British woodland management to mean any smaller area covered in trees, however dense. (Forest is usually used in the British Isles only for more extensive wooded areas, again however dense – and also including Royal forests, which may not be wooded at all)." vabe, rimangono dubbi. In Italia l'uso (tagwatch 18 sett 09) corrente è: landuse forest 7187 natural wood 1446 ciao, Martin _______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
