allora, sulla [dev]-list c'erano due risposte (in inglese, mi permetto di incollare qui sperando che capite tutti):
1. Lennard (chi mantiene lo stylesheet di mapnik): Well, what do you expect when you add an inner way (the building) to an area object (the administrative region)? Never mind any additional tags. It will be interpreted as such: a gap in the area. An enclave, in this particular case, with an appropriate line drawn around the building. So there you have it: don't add stuff to area datatypes that doesn't belong in them. 2. Frederik This is what I would have expected. At least any code that I have written will completely disregard outer/inner tags and instead find out for itself whether something is outer or inner. Adding anything other than rings of a polygon to a multipolygon relation is not supported. I know the practice of adding "admin centre" nodes or so but I don't think it makes sense. If you really want to model this right then you need to do: (relation 1) is a type=whatever that represents the country (relation 2) is a type=boundary or multipolygon that represents the country's border or land and is member of r1 in role "border" (node/way 3) represents the admin center and is member of r1 in role "admin_centre" Countries have admin centres, and countries have boundaries - not "boundaries have admin centres", and neither "countries are boundaries". Bye Frederik ciao, Martin _______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it