いいだです。 OSMFのDWG（Data Working Group, データ作業部会）より、アンケートの依頼が行われました。
内容としては、特定のプロジェクトなどにおいて、有償でデータ編集を行ったり、 あるいは、例えば学校の課題などに代表される組織的な活動を行う際のポリシー策定について、 どのような規約や取り決めを定めてゆくべきか、という内容になっています。 なお、このアンケートで想定される対象は、有償あるいは組織的なマッピングです。 例えばマッピングパーティなどで初心者に対して講習しながら作業する、というような、 小規模でアドホックな集まりに関しては検討の対象外となります。 アンケート調査は、以下のURLから可能です。 The survey is available at https://osm-dwg.limequery.org/741554 また、内容が英語で回答ができない、というかたのために、私家訳ではありますが、 こちらにアンケートの内容について、翻訳を置きました。 参考までにご利用ください。 誤訳などあれば、ご指摘いただけると助かります。 アンケートは選択式になっていて、文字入力するのは「あなたの住んでいる地域は？」の部分だけです。 だいたいのかたは「Japan」と入力いただければ大丈夫と思います。 http://qiita.com/nyampire/items/c801b0bc562436951f9a ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> Date: 2017-09-20 13:51 GMT+09:00 Subject: [OSM-talk] DWG survey on organised editing To: Talk Openstreetmap <t...@openstreetmap.org> The Data Working Group is conducting a survey as part of its work on a policy covering paid mapping. When OpenStreetMap started, it was largely a project of hobbyists contributing to OSM in their spare time. They chose freely what to map and which tools to use, and they took individual responsibility for their contributions. The continuing growth and popularity of OSM have also brought more and more organised mapping efforts, mostly in the form of companies setting up paid data teams to improve OSM data in specific regions or for specific use cases, but also unpaid groups like school classes that are directed to work on OSM. These organised mapping efforts are an integral part of today's OSM contribution landscape and, when done well, help make OSM better and more widely known. In order to ensure good communication, and a level playing field, between individual community members and organised editing groups, the OSMF Data Working Group has been tasked with developing guidelines for organised groups. These guidelines will above all set out some transparency requirements for organised groups - things that are already voluntarily followed by most groups today, like informing the mapping community about which accounts edit for the team. We have prepared the following survey with a few questions about such a policy to give us a better understanding of what the mapping community expects from such a policy. The survey is aimed at everyone editing (or planning to edit) in OSM, whether as individual mappers or as part of a team, and your answers will help us in fleshing out a draft policy. Within the scope of the survey, and the policy to be written, we define paid mapping (or paid editing) as any editing in OSM performed by someone who is told by a third party what to map (and potentially also how to map it) and who receives money in exchange. We define other organised mapping (or editing) as any editing that is also steered by a third party, but where no money is paid. The survey is available at https://osm-dwg.limequery.org/741554 -- Paul Norman For the OSM Data Working Group _______________________________________________ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
