Dear dominique28, Thanks for reporting this. I am open to adding residential polygons to the garmin map, however, there are lot of data inconsistency at the moment.
Villages/subdivision names are tagged either as: 1. point, place=hamlet 2. point, place=village 2. area, landuse=residential We need to at least agree on the general convention on mapping these features. Any suggestions? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, edgardo bautista II <eddie_boy...@yahoo.com > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, maning sambale > <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > assignment for amenity=place_of_worship. > Done for this feature. Let me know if there are other issues for other > POIs. > > > -- > cheers, > maning > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Goodmorning! > > i'm the user who noticed that sanctuario de san antonio doesn't appear on > the garmin maps. i also noticed that these polygons labeled as residential > also appears as blank on the garmin. > > Cypress Towers > 14.52879 > 121.05814 > > Rosewood pointe & royal palm > 14.52708 > 121.06338 > > thanks! > > dominique28 > > > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
