Done! All landuse=residential are treated as place=hamlet. You can now search them in the map. However, you cannot see any polygon when using the provided typ file. The style file needs more work.
I also added a generic category for other garmin specific uncategorized POIs in mapped polygons. Please test if these area searchable now (me thinks not yet) building=* | man_made=* | amenity=* | tourism=* [0x13 resolution 24] On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How about we do pre-processing on the OSM file to add place=hamlet nodes to > every named landuse=residential? I don't like the idea of adding a > place=hamlet to all landuse=residential in the OSM database since we don't > distinguish landuse=residential as a gated community (e.g. Ayala Alabang > Village: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/32981525 ) and as a small > residential lot (e.g., Pacific Plaza Towers: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37226010 ) > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:26 AM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Dear dominique28, >> >> Thanks for reporting this. I am open to adding residential polygons to the >> garmin map, however, there are lot of data inconsistency at the moment. >> >> Villages/subdivision names are tagged either as: >> 1. point, place=hamlet >> 2. point, place=village >> 2. area, landuse=residential >> >> We need to at least agree on the general convention on mapping these >> features. Any suggestions? >> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, edgardo bautista II >> <eddie_boy...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, maning sambale >>> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > assignment for amenity=place_of_worship. >>> Done for this feature. Let me know if there are other issues for other >>> POIs. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> cheers, >>> maning >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Goodmorning! >>> >>> i'm the user who noticed that sanctuario de san antonio doesn't appear on >>> the garmin maps. i also noticed that these polygons labeled as residential >>> also appears as blank on the garmin. >>> >>> Cypress Towers >>> 14.52879 >>> 121.05814 >>> >>> Rosewood pointe & royal palm >>> 14.52708 >>> 121.06338 >>> >>> thanks! >>> >>> dominique28 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> cheers, >> maning >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > > > > -- > http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
