Hi Feye, This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know what was happening. :-)
Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is still "credited" somehow in the existing objects in the database. I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems they have not read it. :( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 ~Eugene On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal <andalf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Sir, > > We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for > the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only > uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir > Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. > > We apologize for not informing you right away. > > Thanks, > Feye > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets >> that only say "adding attribute"? >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history >> >> Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. >> >> ~Eugene >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> >> >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
