Hi Ronny,
I thought of using the new itinary calculation crossing the  Abacan bridge. I 
can see from the map in this area that in Philippines, like elsewhere, ref tag 
is used for roads (here ref=R-9).See the link for the 
itinaryhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=15.1682%2C120.5893%3B15.1426%2C120.5962#map=15/15.1554/120.5929
With OSRM, it does show the ref-R-9 but do not report bridge crossing. With 
Mapquest, there is even less info.
I wonder if OSMAnd on Android or any other road calculation software would 
report bridge crossing.
Pierre 

      De : Ronny Ager-Wick <ro...@ager-wick.com>
 À : Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com>; Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> 
Cc : OSM-PH <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> 
 Envoyé le : Mercredi 18 février 2015 20h18
 Objet : Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels
   
 This is a good point Eugene, and in fact the bridge names are very good 
landmarks, given that there are not many other signs on the roads in the 
Philippines, especially in rural areas. Another thing to take into 
consideration is that many bridges gain their name from the river they cross 
over, so there may be many bridges with the same name. They are definitely not 
tagged consistently at the moment, for example:
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/15.15516/120.59219
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/15.15840/120.60712
 If I remember correctly, they are both named Abacan Bridge, but only one of 
them has that name on the map, and incidentally the one with a different road 
name on each side does not.
 
 Do you know if common routing software will pick up the bridge:name=* tag?
 Yes, I know we're not supposed to tag based on what current software will pick 
up, but it is interesting to know, given that bridges are such great landmarks.
 
 It would be great with a published suggested standard that fits the Philippine 
conditions.
 Ronny.
 
 
 On 2015-02-19 08:08, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
  
    Hi Pierre,
 
  Most bridges here in the Philippines have names no matter how small. You can 
usually spot their name on the guard rail or on a small sign just before the 
bridge. These names are almost always accompanied by the maximum load the 
bridge can handle (which is tagged using maxweight=*) and sometimes  with the 
distance from the island's zero-kilometer marker (I have no idea how to tag 
these. Maybe distance=*?).
 
  Some examples:
 
 
http://www.philippinesdailyphotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bukidnon-atugan-bridge.jpg
 
http://www.zamboanga.com/z/images/0/09/Calapan_Bridge,_Calapan,_Kabasalan,_Zamboanga_Sibugay,_Philippines.JPG
 http://static.rappler.com/images/tullahan-bridge-screengrab-20130708.jpg
   
 Regards,
 Eugene
 
    
 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
 
   Eugene, 
  I expect that only the major bridges have name. And we generally refer to 
these by their name and not the road reference. Unless you have  
particularities in Philippines. Example Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco 
bay. OpenStreetMap | ‪Golden Gate Bridge‬ (‪52477381‬)
     Pierre 
  
      De : Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com>
 À : Ervin Malicdem <schad...@gmail.com> 
 Cc : OSM-PH <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> 
 Envoyé le : Mercredi 18 février 2015 12h35
 Objet : Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels
     
      Hi Ervin,
 
  Option 1 is what I do.
 
  Take note that if we have a way with highway=something and bridge=yes, then 
the object is primarily a highway/road and the bridge is only an aspect or 
property of the highway/road segment. Therefore, the name=* tag should be the 
name of the highway/road. And then put the name of the bridge on the 
bridge:name=* tag.
 
  Besides, it will be very weird to have a long highway with unconnected names 
just because there are bridges along the highway.
 
 The only time I would put the name of the bridge on the name=* tag is if the 
roads from both ends of the bridge have different names. For example, the 
bridge formerly called Del Pan in Manila: www.openstreetmap.org/way/4304674
 
  ~Eugene
 
   
 On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Ervin Malicdem <schad...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
 
       Query regarding tagging bridges.
  What is the appropriate way of tagging bridges?
 
  Option1: Use the name of the road, and place the name of  the bridge under 
bridge:name or the name of the tunnel under tunnel:name
 
  Option2: Use the name of the bridge/tunnel, omit the road  name
 
  Thanks
   
       Ervin M.
 Schadow1 Expeditions - A Filipino must not be a  stranger to his own 
motherland.  http://www.s1expeditions.com             
_______________________________________________
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


 
 
  
    
 _______________________________________________
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  
 
        
  
  
  
 _______________________________________________
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 

  
_______________________________________________
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Reply via email to