Also see OSMPH Telegram. VJMEJ Planned is already on our radar there. On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 12:13 AM Jherome Miguel <jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Evidence are their their diary entries that are basically harassment; > those can be easily reported and deleted. Also look at > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119747584 for an example of their > MO of revenge attacks that follow the established MO of Open Paint Maps. > When I reverted multiple change sets this morning, they came back and > posted a comment that basically returned back the claims regarding their > behavior to me. This kind of threatening behavior isn't new to me; I can > remember one case back in 2017 on Wikipedia over removal of items in "In > the news" by an IP; I asked administrations to block them, and after that, > they hounded me with false sock puppet accusations (though the primary > report is with edit warring and generally disruptive behavior). The user is > evading a block, and they're returning attack by falsely accusing them of > the same thing. > > Whether the two are the same person is hard to tell, but it's very obvious > from the ones I've observed. Perhaps DWG should do an IP address check? > Blocking "VJMEJ Planned" for just a short time, to me, won't deter them; > whether they'll use the account again or create another after that, they'll > keep on disrupting the database and threatening anyone who get into their > way. > >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
