On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <christ...@b3e.net> wrote: > Well, I just updated the Birmingham scheme two days ago to accept > naptan:verified=yes, because Andy asked for it. > > Perhaps it makes sense to reorganise the schemes to have only one basic > scheme which displays verification status, CUS and notes/errors and a > number of specialised schemes building on top of the basic one for > information that is not available everywhere like route references, > shelter information and asset references. > > That sounds sensible. The basic scheme would presumably be enough for generalist mappers like me to be sure we're tidying NAPTAN up, without needing all the transport geek data I've never heard of?
Best, Tom -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
