That makes sense. So if a bus stop has one or more relations added, should it be counted as equivalent to a route_ref tag in the colour scheme, i.e. not marked as needing a route_ref tag?
You could also check if there are relations matching up to route_ref entries for areas where they were put in. Tom On 24 March 2010 08:13, Shaun McDonald <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote: > The route ref is an interim data level until the relations are added. Think > of it as house numbers being initially added as points, and then full > building outlines being added at a later stage at which point the building > number gets transferred to the building outline. > > Shaun > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 07:58, Tom Chance wrote: > > That all sounds good, though if we add stops to route relations do they > really need route_ref? > > Tom > > On Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM, "Christoph Böhme" <christ...@b3e.net> wrote: > > Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> schrieb: > > > On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <christ...@b3e.net> wrote: > > > > Well, I just updated t... > Yes, exactly. My current plan is to have four types of stops in the > basic scheme: > > 1. Non-NaPTAN stops: Stops without naptan:*-tags. Basically plain > old OSM bus stops. > 2. Unverified NaPTAN stops: Stops from the NaPTAN import which > have a naptan:verified=no tag or which are missing the > highway=bus_stop tag. > 3. Verified NaPTAN stops: Stops tagged as hightway=bus_stop and with > either no naptan:verified tag or a naptan:verified=yes tag. > 4. CUS-stops: Stops with naptan:BusStopType=CUS because they are not > marked on the ground and cannot be verified. > > Extended schemes would be: > > 1. Stops with notes: Highlight stops with a note or naptan:error tag > 2. Route information: Highlight stops which are missing the route_ref > tag. > 3. Shelter and asset refs: Highlight bus stops which have shelter=yes > and no asset_ref or which have no shelter tag at all (this might be > quite Birmingham specific). > 4. Anything else? > > I suggest to keep the old schemes but rename them to the name of the > public transport network they apply to (e.g. "Transport West Midlands" > for Birmingham), since they are based on the amount of information that > is available on the signs used by a particular network. > > Best, > Christoph > > > Best, > Tom > > -- > http://tom.acrewoods.net > http://twitter.com/tom_chance > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit