čet, 2. srp 2015. 16:32 Roger Slevin <ro...@slevin.plus.com> je napisao:
I think you are falling into the trap of trying to cover too many things in one relationship. A stoparea to me as a public transport person is (defined functionally) a cluster of stoppoints at which it is possible to interchange between services – and as such it is also a collection of stops for which a single stop name can be shared (in the UK we then have a separate “indicator” to allow you to make the naming of each stoppoint unique within the stoparea. IMHO there is no sense in using a stop_area_group relation (You probably meant stop_area_group instead of stop_area) to show where you can interchange between services. That is already obvious if they are near each other, isn't it? Any two stops that are within ~100m from each other can be seen as an stop_area_group. You don't have to make a relation to tell you that. I see no reason to group objects in stop_area_groups, unless maybe if there is a name or ref that only makes sense to give to a collection of stops, and they all have different names. But if you are talking about a station, we have the tag public_transport=station. Janko Mihelić
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
