2015-07-02 15:52 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>: > If you are adding stop_areas, then there certainly have to be two of them, > one on each side. One of them is put in the route that goes one way, the > other one is put in the other way. I'm also pretty sure that the > stop_area_group is not needed. If they are near each other, then it's a > group. But to someone "near each other" means within 400m, to someone in a > wheelchair it means ramps, to a blind person it means traffic lights with > sound. What else can a group achieve that spatial placement can't? Maybe if > a group has a ref. > Aggregate data to reduce duplication, and provide strong and explicit links betweens features.
> After all this, I'm not sure that stop_area is absolutely necessary. > Stop_position and platform are nearby, so there is really not that much > chance an algorithm is going to connect the wrong ones. If it was me, I > would just add all the refs to the platform, like you did, and ignore all > the refs on the stop_position. Job done, no relations needed. > In a mutlimodal hub (rail,buses, etc.) that could easily be the case. Anyway explicit is most often better than implicit.
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
