Maybe, the OpenRailwayMap mailing list openrailway...@openrailwaymap.org <mailto:openrailway...@openrailwaymap.org> might be helpful? I can not access their archives so I do not know if it is active, but it might be worth a try.
May 18, 2019, 10:55 p.m. by nice...@att.net: > Tim, > This is a good point, but what if OpenRailwayMap were able to pull from > OpenHistoricalMap to generate a complete picture of the network? I say > 'picture' because it wouldn't be connected for routing purposes, but it > should appear connected on a map tile. I have no idea how much additional > work that would be for OpenRailwayMap to show. > > On 5/18/2019 11:40 AM, Tim Saunders wrote: > >> I suspect I am a lone voice but I don't agree.� The thing that >> differentiates railways from a lot of historical features is they form a >> network, some if which is still an operating railway and a lot of which is >> still visible in the ground.� Having the extant sections in one database >> and the razed/dismantled sections in another is just making it unnecessarily >> complex to form a picture of the entire network, which for the sake of a few >> additional ways on OSM (which I agree would not generally be rendered) can >> be easily solved. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tim Saunders >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
