dave wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:00 -0400, John Callahan wrote: > > > > To answer your question...Yes, our new road dataset is a significant > > improvement over current TIGER data (which I obtained from > > http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2007/tgrshp2007.html) > > Could you qualify that a bit for us? How much better? In what ways?
i confess i haven't looked closely at the tiger import, but i'd also be curious about uniformity of the meta-data -- e.g., does the new data include all the address information that tiger provides? all the route name/number information? placename/landmark info? there's some value in having all that be uniform across states. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (arlington, ma, where it's 70.9 degrees) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-us
